Skip to main content

24 September 2025

What Every Teacher Should Know: Key Insights from Microsoft’s 2025 AI in Education Report

Becci Peters profile image
Written by

Becci Peters

Artificial intelligence is already shifting the landscape of education—and the new 2025 Microsoft AI in Education Report offers a timely snapshot of where things stand, what’s working, and what leaders and teachers must consider going forward.  Below is a teacher-friendly summary of the report’s main findings, with reflections and prompts to spark discussion in your own school.

Why this matters

  • AI is no longer a fringe tool or futuristic concept in schools—it is increasingly woven into educational systems, administrative workflows, and classroom practices. 

  • For teachers, AI offers more than time-saving automation. It can help personalise learning, support student agency, spark creativity, and reimagine what learning looks like. 

  • But success depends on thoughtful integration, professional learning, and collaborative planning—not ad hoc adoption.

 

Major Findings: Use, Benefits & Challenges

Here are the report’s key findings:

1. Rapid adoption, but uneven fluency

  • A large majority of education organisations now report using generative AI—among the highest adoption rates observed in any industry. 

  • Usage among students and teachers has grown sharply year over year. 

  • Yet, despite usage, fewer than half of teachers and students say they “know a lot” about how AI works—indicating a gap in deep literacy. 

Implication for teachers: Many of us may already be using AI-powered tools (sometimes unknowingly). The challenge is to shift from “using” to “understanding and guiding” AI use responsibly in learning.

2. Practical use cases in teaching, learning, and operations

The report highlights how AI is being used across different roles:

  • For students: As a brainstorming partner, explainer, research assistant, or learning support tool. 

  • For teachers: To help with lesson planning, generating resources, adapting materials for diverse learners, translation support in multilingual contexts, and answering common questions. 

  • For leaders/administration: To streamline administrative processes, improve communications, provide accessibility tools, and support data-driven decision-making. 

Some real-world examples:

  • In Northern Ireland, Copilot was used to reduce teacher workload in preparing materials and help with differentiated resource creation. 

  • In Czechia, schools used AI translation to communicate with parents and students coming from diverse linguistic backgrounds. 

These use cases show that AI is not just about “doing tasks faster” — it can help extend what educators and students could do.

3. Learning gains, equity, and limitations

  • In a study in Nigeria, using Microsoft Copilot in English language classes resulted in measurable improvement in student performance. 

  • Interestingly, the report notes that socioeconomic status did not significantly affect AI-assisted outcomes, suggesting that AI may help reduce certain inequalities—provided access and support are equitable. 

  • The most effective learning seems to come not when AI replaces traditional teaching, but when it is used in tandem with human-led instruction and scaffolded learning. 

4. Concerns, risks, and barriers

Despite optimism, the report surfaces several persistent worries:

  • Plagiarism / academic integrity is a top concern among educators; students worry about being unfairly accused. 

  • Overreliance: Some worry that students might lean too heavily on AI, diminishing their own critical thinking or writing skills. 

  • Misinformation: Ensuring AI-provided content is accurate and reliable is a challenge. 

  • Privacy, security, and infrastructure: Many leaders cite resource constraints, data protection, and safe deployment as barriers. 

  • Training gaps: Around half of educators globally report having had no AI-related training, despite institutional claims of providing it. 

In other words: intention and ambition are there, but the scaffolding, infrastructure, and ethical guardrails often are not.

Sign up for our CoPilot online session

Recommendations & Practical Steps for Teachers and Schools

The report includes several recommendations. Here’s how teachers or school leadership might act on them:

Co-develop clear policies around when and how AI should be used. Invite students to contribute to that conversation.

Use our AI policy template

Provide ongoing, job-embedded AI professional learning (not just one-off workshops). Encourage peer coaching and pilot projects.

Join our AI community for updates on CPD

Ensure that AI initiatives support your school’s mission (e.g. equity, student agency, well-being) rather than drive it haphazardly.

Start small, with controlled pilots in specific classes or departments. Collect feedback, refine, then scale.

Rather than banning AI, structure tasks so students use AI as a collaborator—planning, drafting, reflecting—rather than a shortcut.

Be intentional about access, data protection, and student agency. Avoid reinforcing inequities by ensuring all students can access tools.

Some forward-looking ideas mentioned in the report are also worth considering:

  • Encourage students to think of AI as a “thought partner” rather than a ghostwriter. 

  • Let students draft, critique, and refine with AI prompts, using the human teacher to guide and shape the outcomes. 

  • Use AI to analyse unstructured educational data (like open responses, behaviour logs) to surface patterns and insights that help with differentiated instruction. 

 

 

Questions for Reflection / Discussion in Your School

Here are some prompts you might use in staff meetings or collaborative planning sessions:

  1. In our current teaching practice, where might AI tools already be influencing what we do (unknowingly)?

  2. What are the risks we see if students overuse AI, or if it becomes a crutch rather than a tool?

  3. Which classes or topics in our school might lend themselves well to pilot AI-supported tasks or assessments?

  4. What infrastructure, permissions, or training would we need to run a small classroom trial?

  5. How can we involve students in co-designing AI usage policies or norms?

  6. How will we ensure that AI use enhances (rather than diminishes) student agency, creativity, and critical thinking?

 

Final Thoughts

The 2025 Microsoft AI in Education Report paints a picture of a moment of transition. AI is no longer on the horizon—it’s here, and many educators and students are already engaging with it. But its impact will depend heavily on how we use it, why we use it, and whether we build the professional knowledge, ethical guardrails, and collaborative cultures required to make it a constructive partner in learning.

For teachers, the invitation is not just to adopt AI, but to become guides, curators, and critical users of it. As more schools begin exploring, piloting, refining—and sometimes stumbling—we’re collectively shaping what education looks like in the AI era.

Read the Microsoft Report